<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cursor Marketplace on SoloSoft</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/cursor-marketplace/</link><description>Recent content in Cursor Marketplace on SoloSoft</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/cursor-marketplace/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Same Version, Three Files: Auditing the Claude Code Extension Backdoor Against Both Public Registries</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/post/claude-code-extension-backdoor-version-identity-audit/</link><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.solosoft.dev/post/claude-code-extension-backdoor-version-identity-audit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On 29 October 2026, for eleven hours and eight minutes, &lt;code&gt;Anthropic.claude-code&lt;/code&gt; was a backdoor. Not a lookalike name, not a typo-squatted publisher, not a &lt;code&gt;cIaude-code&lt;/code&gt; with a capital i — the real identifier, the real publisher namespace, and version numbers that matched a real release line: 2.1.312 and 2.1.313. The bundle it served contained an immediately-invoked function that wrote an attacker&amp;rsquo;s SSH key into &lt;code&gt;~/.ssh/authorized_keys&lt;/code&gt;, opened a reverse tunnel to &lt;code&gt;134.209.82[.]225&lt;/code&gt;, and installed reboot-surviving persistence on macOS, Linux and Windows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every write-up of this incident so far has had to open with a caveat, because the central question — &lt;em&gt;was the official extension compromised, or only the mirror?&lt;/em&gt; — was answered by competing press releases. Anthropic&amp;rsquo;s engineers said the official channels were clean. Commenters pointed out that Cursor mirrors Open VSX, so &amp;ldquo;clean upstream&amp;rdquo; was doing a lot of work in that sentence. Security Boulevard and a Binance-hosted syndication of ChainCatcher both claimed the malicious build had been published to Open VSX. One Hacker News thread carried 435 comments across 78 top-level threads and never settled it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>