<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Dual Licensing on SoloSoft</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/dual-licensing/</link><description>Recent content in Dual Licensing on SoloSoft</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/dual-licensing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Bitwarden's Dual License Move: 823 Commercial Files, 52 Hidden Bundle Files, and the 95 Routes the Open-Source Build Never Ships</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/post/bitwarden-dual-license-audit/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.solosoft.dev/post/bitwarden-dual-license-audit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On October 9, 2026, a Bitwarden staff account posted a five-line notice on the company&amp;rsquo;s community forum: &amp;ldquo;Starting in the next release, the Bitwarden apps published to the various stores will be the commercially licensed builds. No action is needed, and the apps will work exactly as they do today.&amp;rdquo; It is the kind of announcement that reads like housekeeping. It is not. Within a day the thread had 52 posts and 40,121 views, and Hacker News had taken it to 338 points and 244 comments, most of them framing it as the opening move of a rug pull.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The interesting part is not the announcement. It is that the thing the announcement describes has been shipping for a while, and you can measure it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>