<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Motion Graphics on SoloSoft</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/motion-graphics/</link><description>Recent content in Motion Graphics on SoloSoft</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/motion-graphics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Fact-Checking the Viral 'Netflix Engineer' Video Repo List: 19 Owners, Zero Netflix, and 228,408 Stars That Mostly Predate Opus 5.5</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/post/netflix-engineer-video-repos-fact-check/</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.solosoft.dev/post/netflix-engineer-video-repos-fact-check/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A list is circulating with a headline that does a lot of work: &lt;em&gt;Netflix engineer releases 20 GitHub repositories that turn Claude Opus 5.5 into a video generation machine.&lt;/em&gt; Below it sit twenty links, a two-line description of each, and a workflow summary — Opus writes the code, the skill libraries set the rhythm and the camera, an engine outputs MP4 — followed by the advice to look at each repository before installing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That closing advice is the only part the list itself did not follow. I checked all twenty entries against the GitHub API and against the repositories&amp;rsquo; own files, and the headline does not survive contact with any of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>