<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>PLFM_RADAR on SoloSoft</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/plfm_radar/</link><description>Recent content in PLFM_RADAR on SoloSoft</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/plfm_radar/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>25,759 Stars, a $3,991 Bare-Board Quote and a '20 km' Figure That Is Really a Timing Limit: Auditing the Open-Source AERIS-10 Radar</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/post/aeris-10-open-source-radar-audit/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.solosoft.dev/post/aeris-10-open-source-radar-audit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A GitHub repository called &lt;code&gt;PLFM_RADAR&lt;/code&gt; currently has 25,759 stars, 5,886 forks and a one-paragraph pitch that would be remarkable even if half of it were true: an open-source, low-cost 10.5 GHz phased array pulse-LFM radar, published with schematics, Gerbers, BOMs, FPGA Verilog and a Python GUI. Two versions — a 3 km &amp;ldquo;Nexus&amp;rdquo; and a 20 km &amp;ldquo;Extended&amp;rdquo;. The press picked it up in April with the headline &amp;ldquo;Open-source DIY radar that&amp;rsquo;s 95% cheaper than $250k commercial offerings&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That framing is where the trouble starts, because the repository itself is a very different document from the marketing. It is also, on balance, a more interesting one: a 225 MB open-hardware project where you can watch a solo engineer, an AI-assisted contributor pipeline and a group of strangers on the issue tracker try to converge on a buildable X-band radar at the same time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>