<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>RAM Bandwidth on SoloSoft</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/ram-bandwidth/</link><description>Recent content in RAM Bandwidth on SoloSoft</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/ram-bandwidth/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Auditing Strata: 125B on a 12 GB Card, 62 GB/s of RAM Bandwidth, and a 5× Contradiction in the Docs</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/post/strata-125b-consumer-card-audit/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.solosoft.dev/post/strata-125b-consumer-card-audit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;Niko1221/Strata&lt;/code&gt; promises that a 125-billion-parameter model — Qwen3.8-Flash-Next — runs on your own gaming PC, that &amp;ldquo;a graphics card with 12 GB or more&amp;rdquo; is enough, and that it writes 94 tokens per second while doing it. It was created on 24 September 2026 and pushed to on 4 October, it reached the front page of Hacker News with 595 points and 279 comments, and it has &lt;strong&gt;11,048 stars and 969 forks in 11 days&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The headline is the kind that usually collapses on contact. This one does not. I downloaded the repository, queried the GitHub API for the release, contributor and issue history, read the three documents that describe the engine, pulled the documentation&amp;rsquo;s own numbers apart, and did the memory-bandwidth arithmetic myself. The speed claim survives — but it survives for a reason the marketing sentence hides, and the same repository contradicts itself by a factor of 5.3 on prompt speed.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>