<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Smart City on SoloSoft</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/smart-city/</link><description>Recent content in Smart City on SoloSoft</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/smart-city/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Waymo's Testing Halt Marks a Critical Turning Point for Cities to Get Ahead in t</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/trends/2026-04-09-with-waymo-testing-halted-we-have-a-rare-chance-to/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.solosoft.dev/trends/2026-04-09-with-waymo-testing-halted-we-have-a-rare-chance-to/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="a-pause-is-not-a-failure-but-a-strategic-window-for-cities-to-reclaim-dominance"&gt;A Pause is Not a Failure, But a Strategic Window for Cities to Reclaim Dominance&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The answer is clear: this is a rare breathing and planning space for cities and regulators.&lt;/strong&gt; Over the past decade, we have witnessed tech platforms charge ahead in transportation and accommodation under the banner of &amp;ldquo;disruptive innovation,&amp;rdquo; by the time regulations catch up, established facts and user habits are already formed, and bargaining chips are lost. The essence of Waymo&amp;rsquo;s testing pause is New York City&amp;rsquo;s refusal to hand over &amp;ldquo;sovereignty&amp;rdquo; of public roads under conditions of data black boxes and unclear safety commitments. This is not anti-technology, but a demand for a fairer, more transparent negotiation of the rules of the game. For cities worldwide watching—including Taipei, Singapore, London—this demonstrates that dominance can be contested, with the key being whether they are prepared with a public-interest-based tech governance framework.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>