<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>SOC 2 Readiness on SoloSoft</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/soc-2-readiness/</link><description>Recent content in SOC 2 Readiness on SoloSoft</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/soc-2-readiness/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>96,636 Stars, 152 Watchers, 115.6M Downloads: What Orca's Release Feed Actually Proves</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/post/orca-96636-stars-152-watchers-download-audit/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.solosoft.dev/post/orca-96636-stars-152-watchers-download-audit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Orca is a desktop application that runs several coding agents side by side, each in its own git worktree, and lets you steer them from a phone. It is MIT-licensed, backed by Y Combinator, and its repository (&lt;code&gt;stablyai/orca&lt;/code&gt;) was created on 17 March 2026. When I pulled the repository metadata on 19 October 2026 it read like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
 &lt;thead&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Field&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;th&gt;Value (GitHub API, 2026-10-19 UTC)&lt;/th&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/thead&gt;
 &lt;tbody&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Stars&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;96,636&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Forks&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;6,177&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Watchers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;152&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Open issues + open PRs (&lt;code&gt;open_issues_count&lt;/code&gt;)&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;8,471&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Commits on &lt;code&gt;main&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;15,007&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Branches&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;11,876&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Tags / releases&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;1,129 / 977&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Contributors&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;604&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Repository size&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;1,451,413 KB (~1.45 GB)&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;Primary language&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;TypeScript (95.1%)&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;tr&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;License&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;td&gt;MIT&lt;/td&gt;
 &lt;/tr&gt;
 &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every one of those numbers is real. The interesting part is that they do not describe the same thing, and two of them — stars and downloads — are routinely read as if they did. This is an attempt to read the repository as instrument data rather than as a popularity contest, and to say plainly where the data supports the marketing and where it does not.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>