<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Text-to-Cad on SoloSoft</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/text-to-cad/</link><description>Recent content in Text-to-Cad on SoloSoft</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.solosoft.dev/tags/text-to-cad/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Auditing text-to-cad: 17,978 Stars, a Two-Tool MCP Server, and the 822 MB Runtime Behind "CAD Superpowers"</title><link>https://www.solosoft.dev/post/text-to-cad-agent-cad-audit/</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.solosoft.dev/post/text-to-cad-agent-cad-audit/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Give your agent CAD superpowers&amp;rdquo; is the entire pitch: 17,978 stars say the pitch landed, and the top-half GitHub Trending list — plus a Hacker News thread that hit 186 points on 2026-05-01 — says people believe it. So I installed it, built a real part with it, and measured everything the README does not put a number on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The short version: this is one of the more disciplined agent-tooling repositories currently shipping (76 releases in 129 days, none without release notes, MIT, byte-determinism as a documented promise), and the interesting part is precisely where its guarantees stop. The project is fanatically rigorous about the layer a machine can check — source into bytes, geometry into verdicts — and silent about the layer where the ambiguity actually lives, which is your sentence about the part you want.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>